by Ferdinand Eibl (Author)
Why have social spending levels and social policy trajectories diverged so drastically across labour-abundant Middle Eastern and North African regimes? And how can we explain the marked persistence of spending levels after divergence? Using historical institutionalism and a mix of qualitative
and quantitative methods Social Dictatorships: The Political Economy of the Welfare State in the Middle East and North Africa develops an explanation of social spending in authoritarian regimes. It emphasizes the importance of early elite conflict and attempts to form a durable support coalition
under the constraints imposed by external threats and scarce resources.
multi-level approach tested comparatively at the cross-country level and process-traced at micro-level by these case studies.
Author Biography
Ferdinand Eibl, Lecturer in Political Economy, King's College London, UK